CASES OF PARTICULAR INTEREST
Makuchyan and Minasyan v. Azerbaijan and Hungary
Violation of Article 2 – Right to life (Article 2 – Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Azerbaijan) No violation of Article 2 – Right to life (Article 2 – Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Hungary) Violation of Article 14+2 – Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 – Discrimination) (Article 2 – Right to life;Positive obligations) (Azerbaijan);No violation of Article 38 – Examination of the case – {general} (Article 38 – Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities) (Azerbaijan) (Hungary)
Narayan and others v. Azerbaijan
Violation of article 2.
Ghazaryan and Bayramyan v. Azerbaijan
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 – Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 – Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 – Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 – Brought promptly before judge or other officer);No violation of Article 5 – Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 – Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 – Prohibition of torture (Article 3 – Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 – Prohibition of torture (Article 3 – Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage – award (Article 41 – Non-pecuniary damage;Overall assessment)
Badalyan v. Azerbaijan
Violation of Article 3 – Prohibition of torture (Article 3 – Degrading treatment). Violation of Article 5 – Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 – Deprivation of liberty; Lawful arrest or detention).
Saribekyan and Balyan v. Azerbaijan
Khudunts v. Armenia
Inadmissible.
Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction)
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage – award.
Perinchek v. Switzerland
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 – Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions);Violation of Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 – Respect for family life;Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 – Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 – Effective remedy);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 – Just satisfaction).
Case of Delfi AS v. Estonia
No violation of Article 10 – Freedom of expression (Article 10-1 – Freedom to impart information).